Effectiveness of therapeutic heparin versus prophylactic heparin on death, mechanical ventilation, or intensive care unit admission in moderately ill patients with covid-19 admitted to hospital: RAPID randomised clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of therapeutic heparin compared with prophylactic heparin among moderately ill patients with covid-19 admitted to hospital wards. DESIGN: Randomised controlled, adaptive, open label clinical trial. SETTING: 28 hospitals in Brazil, Canada, Ireland, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and US. PARTICIPANTS: 465 adults admitted to hospital wards with covid-19 and increased D-dimer levels were recruited between 29 May 2020 and 12 April 2021 and were randomly assigned to therapeutic dose heparin (n=228) or prophylactic dose heparin (n=237). INTERVENTIONS: Therapeutic dose or prophylactic dose heparin (low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin), to be continued until hospital discharge, day 28, or death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of death, invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or admission to an intensive care unit, assessed up to 28 days. The secondary outcomes included all cause death, the composite of all cause death or any mechanical ventilation, and venous thromboembolism. Safety outcomes included major bleeding. Outcomes were blindly adjudicated. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 60 years; 264 (56.8%) were men and the mean body mass index was 30.3 kg/m2. At 28 days, the primary composite outcome had occurred in 37/228 patients (16.2%) assigned to therapeutic heparin and 52/237 (21.9%) assigned to prophylactic heparin (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 1.10; P=0.12). Deaths occurred in four patients (1.8%) assigned to therapeutic heparin and 18 patients (7.6%) assigned to prophylactic heparin (0.22, 0.07 to 0.65; P=0.006). The composite of all cause death or any mechanical ventilation occurred in 23 patients (10.1%) assigned to therapeutic heparin and 38 (16.0%) assigned to prophylactic heparin (0.59, 0.34 to 1.02; P=0.06). Venous thromboembolism occurred in two patients (0.9%) assigned to therapeutic heparin and six (2.5%) assigned to prophylactic heparin (0.34, 0.07 to 1.71; P=0.19). Major bleeding occurred in two patients (0.9%) assigned to therapeutic heparin and four (1.7%) assigned to prophylactic heparin (0.52, 0.09 to 2.85; P=0.69). CONCLUSIONS: In moderately ill patients with covid-19 and increased D-dimer levels admitted to hospital wards, therapeutic heparin was not significantly associated with a reduction in the primary outcome but the odds of death at 28 days was decreased. The risk of major bleeding appeared low in this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04362085.

Risk Assessment of Hospitalized Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-Infected Patients Using Laboratory Data and Immune Cell Morphologic Assessment.

CONTEXT.­: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a highly infectious agent, with the propensity to cause severe illness. While vaccine uptake has been increasing in recent months, many regions remain at risk of significant coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19)-related health care burden. Health systems will continue to benefit from the availability of a variety of clinical and laboratory models when other triaging models are equivocal. OBJECTIVE.­: To validate previously reported clinical laboratory abnormalities seen in COVID-19 patients and identify what laboratory parameters might be outcome predictive. DESIGN.­: We undertook an observational study of hospital-admitted COVID-19 patients (n = 113), looking at a broad selection of clinical, laboratory, peripheral blood smear, and outcome data during discrete discovery and validation periods from March 2020 to November 2020. RESULTS.­: We confirmed the findings of previous studies noting derangement of a variety of laboratory parameters in COVID-19 patients, including peripheral blood morphologic changes. We also devised a simple-to-use decision tree by which patients could be risk stratified on the basis of red blood cell count, creatinine, urea, and atypical plasmacytoid lymphocyte ("covidocyte") count. This outcome classifier performed comparably to the World Health Organization clinical classifier and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. CONCLUSIONS.­: Our data add to the increasing number of studies cataloguing laboratory changes in COVID-19 and support the clinical utility of incorporating blood morphologic assessment in the workup of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.